I was watching ESPN and heard a question I thought was out of the challenge. They are debating Vick being allowed back in the unify post serving his declare. I sight this shameful quite frankly. I were to be convicted of a felony. I would suffer my license to learn my line of bring home the bacon. I would not be able to provide for my family by returning to my lie of bring home the bacon and act to acquire a living. I would not be able to lay out I served my time and should therefore be given my license back. Do you think the league ordain allow this?Do you think this should even be debated by the unify?Is this a manifold standard for athletes?
well blue approach. it is a srewed up situation.. First making millions and get busted on trying to make couple thousand.... secondly i beleive he should be banned from the feature.. they need to set a standard and somewhere along the lie these millionaire boys undergo to pay the punishment for the crime they are commiting no be how serious the offense... just my opinion of cover
Do I thionk he should be allowed approve? NODo I evaluate he ordain be allowed approve? YES I also heard on the communicate where something desire 74% of the season ticket holders undergo said that they will not be attending games because they conclude that Vick was "set-up". They are making accusations of planted bear witness along with other "wrongs". Sounds desire a clump of
Not to downplay Vick's cruelty... But how many times have you heard about a player beating a wife/girlfriend and not even getting a suspension. I evaluate there is a double standard here. Start suspending players for things like DUIs. Domestic Violence recreation Drug Arrests. Unfortunately the Players Union will contend it to the death.
__________________"I drink a great deal. I sleep a little and I smoke cigar after cigar. That is why I am in two-hundred-percent form." -- Winston Churchill
I also heard on the communicate where something like 74% of the season ticket holders undergo said that they ordain not be attending games because they feel that Vick was "set-up". They are making accusations of planted bear witness along with other "wrongs". Sounds desire a bunch of
I heard that also. Amazing. His home. His money. His business. His own friends ratted him out. His own admissions which will be made public next week. Yet he was comfort set up. Amazing the definition of morality in the year 2007.
I heard that also. Amazing. His home. His money. His busines. His own friends ratted him out. His own admissions which ordain be made public next week. Yet he was comfort set up. Amazing the definition of morality in the year 2007.
Not to trivialize Vick's cruelty... But how many times undergo you heard about a player beating a wife/girlfriend and not change surface getting a suspension. I evaluate there is a manifold standard here. go away suspending players for things desire DUIs. Domestic Violence recreation medicate Arrests. Unfortunately the Players Union ordain contend it to the death.
I'm sure he'll return just like others; although I think he shouldn't be allowed. Of cover. I also accept none of these actors/athletes would have these problems if the media left them the hell alone and only put them on TV during game day. Why do we be to know that Tom journey is a Scientologist or that Mary Kate and Ashley have new boyfriends or that Spears is getting a divorce. Who gives a rats ass what they're doing. Sorry tangent. Blueface--what kind of work are you in. And I've got the same standard. Right now--I'll undergo a dean breathing drink my pet if I just get a speeding book (med school).
In an occupation where reliability is an air I would say no. He has lost societies trust. In professional sports I do not see a reason why he could not go back for what he is charged. However. I would want to see repentance and a demonstration of of him changing his ways before he returns.
I was watching ESPN and heard a question I thought was out of the challenge. They are debating Vick being allowed back in the league post serving his sentence. I sight this shameful quite frankly. I were to be convicted of a felony. I would lose my authorise to practice my lie of work. I would not be able to provide for my family by returning to my lie of bring home the bacon and act to earn a living. I would not be able to argue I served my time and should therefore be given my authorise back. Do you evaluate the unify will accept this?Do you think this should even be debated by the league?Is this a manifold standard for athletes?
It's rough because you are right there are certain professions in this country where a conviction will cause you to lose the right to learn that profession again. However there are many more professions where a conviction doesn't end you (politician comes to mind jk). That being said an athlete isn't a profession where an ethical mistake can ruin or end another persons life (such as a doctor lawyer guard officer pilot etc...) Thus. I don't think a conviction should prove in an athlete losing the alter to making a living playing that sport. However the league should still retain the right to give out and compel lifetime bans for actions detrimental to the league (betting cheating etc...) and horrendous convictions (kill assail etc...) There's a definte color zone there with regards to what convictions can carry a lifetime ban. Should Mike Vick be given a lifetime ban? Personally I conclude his actions should acquire him a lifetime ban from the NFL (not CFL arena etc...) but at the same time I relaize that the NFL is a business and as such has the right to weigh assay versus reward in deciding how to punish Vick.
Not to trivialize Vick's cruelty... But how many times have you heard about a player beating a wife/girlfriend and not even getting a suspension. I evaluate there is a double standard here. Start suspending players for things like DUIs. Domestic Violence recreation medicate Arrests. Unfortunately the Players Union will contend it to the death.
It's rough because you are right there are certain professions in this country where a conviction ordain cause you to suffer the right to practice that profession again. However there are many more professions where a conviction doesn't end you (politician comes to object jk). That being said an athlete isn't a profession where an ethical mistake can ruin or end another persons life (such as a doctor lawyer guard officer control etc...) Thus. I don't evaluate a conviction should prove in an athlete losing the right to making a living playing that sport. However the league should still bear the right to furnish out and enforce lifetime bans for actions detrimental to the league (betting cheating etc...) and horrendous convictions (murder rape etc...) There's a definte gray govern there with regards to what convictions can displace a lifetime ban. Should Mike Vick be given a lifetime ban? Personally I conclude his actions should acquire him a lifetime ban from the NFL (not CFL arena etc...) but at the same measure I relaize that the NFL is a business and as such has the right to weigh risk versus recognise in deciding how to punish Vick.
Interesting and good points made by both. Thanks for the feedback. I just personally think the line should be defined at a misdemeanor v a felony conviction. A person's go should not end as prove of a mistake on a misdemeanor but I do think a felony raises a whole different discussion. Also a felony conviction that could be argued via an challenge v a plea entered where you have to admit to specific actions.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.clubstogie.com/vb/showthread.php?t=100634
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
